From: | Markus Schiltknecht <markus(at)bluegap(dot)ch> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
Cc: | Jeff Frost <jeff(at)frostconsultingllc(dot)com>, Chris Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org>, pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Replication documentation addition |
Date: | 2006-11-15 09:57:38 |
Message-ID: | 455AE492.8000206@bluegap.ch |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
> Jeff Frost wrote:
>> I would speculate that your terminology is slightly more accurate than mine.
I can't help it, but I'm still thinking the terminology in the
replication documentation is somewhat made up.
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Hmmm. Interesting. Does anyone else have details or an opinion on
> this? The fact that there is something sitting above the servers seems
> to be the defining issue of calling it query broadcast.
I'd argue that "Query Broadcast Load Balancing" and "Clustering For Load
Balancing" are both the same replication type: sync, multi-master. And
the problem they try to solve is the same (Load Balancing).
Listing them as two different types of replication... I don't know. But
we should at least clearly state that both are sync, multi-master
replication algorithms.
Anyway, instead of mocking around any longer I'm trying to come up with
a better proposal... patch will follow.
Regards
Markus
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Oleg Bartunov | 2006-11-15 15:46:46 | small improvement to G.2.4.1. Installing OpenJade |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-11-15 01:10:28 | Re: [HACKERS] Replication documentation addition |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Markus Schiltknecht | 2006-11-15 10:43:27 | replication docs: split single vs. multi-master |
Previous Message | Alon Goldshuv | 2006-11-15 01:26:19 | Re: Segmentation fault with HEAD. |