Re: [HACKERS] server process (PID 1188) exited with exit code

From: Oliver Jowett <oliver(at)opencloud(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com>, JEAN-PIERRE PELLETIER <pelletier_32(at)sympatico(dot)ca>, List <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] server process (PID 1188) exited with exit code
Date: 2006-11-12 21:22:42
Message-ID: 455790A2.6050404@opencloud.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-jdbc

Tom Lane wrote:
> Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com> writes:
>
>>This is a server bug, I will post to hackers for you, it has little
>>to do with JDBC, however the ? can't be a column in a prepared statement
>
> I cannot reproduce any problem using what I think is equivalent in libpq:

I thought we got this one sorted out already, it was a server bug fixed
in beta2? At the time you said:

> "JEAN-PIERRE PELLETIER" <pelletier_32(at)sympatico(dot)ca> writes:
>
>>> 08:47:19.296 (1) FE=> Parse(stmt=null,query="select $1 from (select * from
>>> pg_database) t",oids={23})
>
>
> Actually, now that I look closely, this command is almost certainly
> triggering this beta1 bug:
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-committers/2006-10/msg00107.php
>
> Please try beta2 and see if it isn't fixed.
>
> regards, tom lane

(and the problem went away in beta2)

-O

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2006-11-12 21:23:01 Re: Frequent Update Project: Design Overview ofHOTUpdates
Previous Message Jaime Casanova 2006-11-12 21:19:30 Re: error compiling 8.2 in debian sarge

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kris Jurka 2006-11-13 06:02:22 Re: JDBC Support for standard_conforming_strings
Previous Message Tom Lane 2006-11-12 04:06:41 Re: [HACKERS] server process (PID 1188) exited with exit code -1073741819, 8.2 beta1