| From: | Shane Ambler <pgsql(at)007Marketing(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Brendan Jurd <direvus(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Request for replication advice |
| Date: | 2006-11-11 02:35:54 |
| Message-ID: | 4555370A.5030506@007Marketing.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Brendan Jurd wrote:
> Why *does* Slony require a bi-directional connection to the
> subscriber? The data is travelling in one direction only ... what
> needs to come back the other way?
So the slave can say "yes I got that data you can remove it from my TODO
list" ?
> This seems to be getting rather messy. I wonder if I might not be
> better off just writing AFTER triggers on all the tables I'm
> interested in, which replicate the query to the slave system with
> psql. It would probably be relatively labour intensive, and increase
> the burden of administering the schema, but it would also be a much
> more direct and simple approach.
>
That sounds like contrib/dbmirror
--
Shane Ambler
pgSQL(at)007Marketing(dot)com
Get Sheeky @ http://Sheeky.Biz
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | novnov | 2006-11-11 06:26:51 | Utility to Convert MS SQL Server to Postgres |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-11-11 01:21:41 | Re: apparent wraparound |