| From: | Brian Hurt <bhurt(at)janestcapital(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Easy read-heavy benchmark kicking around? |
| Date: | 2006-11-06 20:47:30 |
| Message-ID: | 454F9F62.9070408@janestcapital.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
I'm having a spot of problem with out storage device vendor. Read
performance (as measured by both bonnie++ and hdparm -t) is abysmal
(~14Mbyte/sec), and we're trying to get them to fix it. Unfortunately,
they're using the fact that bonnie++ is an open source benchmark to
weasle out of doing anything- they can't fix it unless I can show an
impact in Postgresql.
So the question is: is there an easy to install and run, read-heavy
benchmark out there that I can wave at them to get them to fix the
problem? I have a second database running on a single SATA drive, so I
can use that as a comparison point- "look, we're getting 1/3rd the read
speed of a single SATA drive- this sucks!"
Any advice?
Brian
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Luke Lonergan | 2006-11-06 20:53:14 | Re: Easy read-heavy benchmark kicking around? |
| Previous Message | Carlos H. Reimer | 2006-11-06 18:29:13 | RES: Context switching |