| From: | Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | creimer(at)brturbo(dot)com(dot)br |
| Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Context switch storm |
| Date: | 2006-11-03 14:38:25 |
| Message-ID: | 454B5461.4030802@archonet.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
creimer(at)brturbo(dot)com(dot)br wrote:
>> If you can keep your numbers of clients down below the critical
>> level, you should find the overall workload is fine.
>
> We have at about 600 connections. Is this a case to use a connection
> pool (pg_pool) system?
Possibly - that should help. I'm assuming that most of your queries are
very short, so you could probably get that figure down a lot lower.
You'll keep the same amount of queries running through the system, just
queue them up.
> And why this happens only with 8.0 and 8.1 and not with the 7.4?
Not sure. Maybe 8.x is making more intensive use of your memory,
possibly with a change in your plans.
--
Richard Huxton
Archonet Ltd
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-11-03 14:50:53 | Re: Query plan for "heavy" SELECT with "lite" sub-SELECTs |
| Previous Message | Richard Troy | 2006-11-03 14:10:21 | Re: Context switch storm |