Re: Context switch storm

From: Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com>
To: creimer(at)brturbo(dot)com(dot)br
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Context switch storm
Date: 2006-11-03 14:38:25
Message-ID: 454B5461.4030802@archonet.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

creimer(at)brturbo(dot)com(dot)br wrote:
>> If you can keep your numbers of clients down below the critical
>> level, you should find the overall workload is fine.
>
> We have at about 600 connections. Is this a case to use a connection
> pool (pg_pool) system?

Possibly - that should help. I'm assuming that most of your queries are
very short, so you could probably get that figure down a lot lower.
You'll keep the same amount of queries running through the system, just
queue them up.

> And why this happens only with 8.0 and 8.1 and not with the 7.4?

Not sure. Maybe 8.x is making more intensive use of your memory,
possibly with a change in your plans.

--
Richard Huxton
Archonet Ltd

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2006-11-03 14:50:53 Re: Query plan for "heavy" SELECT with "lite" sub-SELECTs
Previous Message Richard Troy 2006-11-03 14:10:21 Re: Context switch storm