From: | Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Uwe C(dot) Schroeder" <uwe(at)oss4u(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: time value '24:00:00' |
Date: | 2006-11-02 09:30:05 |
Message-ID: | 4549BA9D.5080008@archonet.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Uwe C. Schroeder wrote:
> On Thursday 02 November 2006 00:59, Richard Huxton wrote:
>> Uwe C. Schroeder wrote:
>>>> Ah, times and dates are wonderful things though. For example, '23:59:60'
>>>> is a valid time (and not equal to 24:00:00 or 00:00:00) every so often.
>>>>
>>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leap_second
>>> Yeah, but isn't the third part milliseconds? Doesn't "milli" imply 1000
>>> and not 60. I may be totally off here though - well, it's getting late
>> Nope - hh:mm:ss.milli
>> And it's early in London, so it *must* be late in Western U.S.A. - see
>> you later :-)
>
> You're right of course. Seconds! Who would have thought about that :-)
> It's past 1am, so I guess I should go hit the mattress ...
>
> PS: and I heard it's darn cold over there too ....
Winter has finally arrived in the U.K. - I hear it was -6C in Wales
first thing this morning.
--
Richard Huxton
Archonet Ltd
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2006-11-02 09:39:06 | Re: Availability of pg_backend_pid() immediately after connection establishment |
Previous Message | Albe Laurenz | 2006-11-02 09:09:02 | Re: postgres import |