Re: Pgsql on Solaris

From: Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com>
To: vodhner(at)cox(dot)net
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Pgsql on Solaris
Date: 2006-11-01 08:53:29
Message-ID: 45486089.3090507@archonet.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

vodhner(at)cox(dot)net wrote:
> Thanks to all who replied.
>
> The reason I wanted to go 64-bit on our Fujitsu sparc-alikes was that
> our sysadmins switched to 64-bit Perl as part of the standard
> package, and that broke our DBD::Pg interface. With no warning, we
> started getting a message about Pg.so, "Wrong ELF Class:
> ELFCLASS32".
>
> My assumption had been that 64-bit was the latest and greatest, so of
> course config should have found the appropriate libraries etc. and
> set me up for a 64-bit make. The answer to my question seems to be
> yes, I could cause 64-bit compilation, but it's not the obvious way
> to go.

You only need the client libraries as 64-bit for this particular problem
. Of course, if server and client are on the same machine then it's
probably simpler to have everything the same.

--
Richard Huxton
Archonet Ltd

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alban Hertroys 2006-11-01 09:03:53 Re: Trouble with plpgsql generic trigger function using
Previous Message Richard Huxton 2006-11-01 08:45:28 Re: Compiling/Installing as a non-admin user