Re: WAL Archiving under Windows

From: Tim Tassonis <timtas(at)cubic(dot)ch>
To: Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: WAL Archiving under Windows
Date: 2006-10-31 16:51:19
Message-ID: 45477F07.1080804@cubic.ch
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Hi Tom

Richard Huxton wrote:
> Tim Tassonis wrote:
>> Hi Tom
>>
>> Tom Lane wrote:
>>> Tim Tassonis <timtas(at)cubic(dot)ch> writes:
>>>> The strange thing is, even with loglevel debug5, I don't get any log
>>>> message indicating that postgres is even trying to call the command.
>>>
>>> Then it isn't, because there are definitely log messages, which were
>>> specifically put there for the purpose of recording the fully-expanded
>>> archive command string:
>>
>> I must be, as I increased the debug level and that actually took
>> place. I did get more log messages.
>>
>> Is there anything else that could prevent the archiving from taking
>> place, without giving any message?
>
> Did you check Tom's suggestion that you haven't got a duplicate
> postgresql.conf somewhere?
>
As I said, other changes in the config file did have an effect, so that
hardly can be the issue.

Bye
Tim

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Teodor Sigaev 2006-10-31 16:53:07 Re: [HACKERS] Index greater than 8k
Previous Message Richard Huxton 2006-10-31 16:38:25 Re: WAL Archiving under Windows