From: | Tim Tassonis <timtas(at)cubic(dot)ch> |
---|---|
To: | Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: WAL Archiving under Windows |
Date: | 2006-10-31 16:51:19 |
Message-ID: | 45477F07.1080804@cubic.ch |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Hi Tom
Richard Huxton wrote:
> Tim Tassonis wrote:
>> Hi Tom
>>
>> Tom Lane wrote:
>>> Tim Tassonis <timtas(at)cubic(dot)ch> writes:
>>>> The strange thing is, even with loglevel debug5, I don't get any log
>>>> message indicating that postgres is even trying to call the command.
>>>
>>> Then it isn't, because there are definitely log messages, which were
>>> specifically put there for the purpose of recording the fully-expanded
>>> archive command string:
>>
>> I must be, as I increased the debug level and that actually took
>> place. I did get more log messages.
>>
>> Is there anything else that could prevent the archiving from taking
>> place, without giving any message?
>
> Did you check Tom's suggestion that you haven't got a duplicate
> postgresql.conf somewhere?
>
As I said, other changes in the config file did have an effect, so that
hardly can be the issue.
Bye
Tim
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Teodor Sigaev | 2006-10-31 16:53:07 | Re: [HACKERS] Index greater than 8k |
Previous Message | Richard Huxton | 2006-10-31 16:38:25 | Re: WAL Archiving under Windows |