| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bill <postgresql(at)dbginc(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Scalability |
| Date: | 2006-10-29 02:17:30 |
| Message-ID: | 45440F3A.4000508@commandprompt.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
>> So in answer to your question, in general -- no the process
>> methodology we use does not limit scalability and it makes our code
>> base much simpler that the equivalent threading model.
>>
>> Sincerely,
>>
>> Joshua D. Drake
>
> Thanks. How much memory does PostgreSQL consume with 2000 connections?
Entirely depends on what you are doing with it :). There is 16GB-32GB in
these particular machines.
>
> Which Linux distribution do you prefer?
>
I prefere Ubuntu, but FreeBSD or pretty much any other 2.6 based Linux
distribution will do.
Joshua D. Drake
--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Christopher Browne | 2006-10-29 03:17:54 | Re: CUBE, ROLLUP, GROUPING SETS? |
| Previous Message | Bill | 2006-10-29 01:57:55 | Re: Scalability |