Re: qsort->pg_qsort in 8.2

From: Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: qsort->pg_qsort in 8.2
Date: 2006-10-27 19:56:51
Message-ID: 45426483.6080304@Yahoo.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 10/27/2006 3:47 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com> writes:
>> since rev. 1.105 of include/port.h all files that inlcude postgres_fe.h
>> are forced to use pg_qsort() instead of qsort. Was that intended?
>
> Is it a problem? If you really want the platform qsort you can #undef
> qsort, but I don't entirely see why you would.

It forces client programs to link against libpgport, which they didn't
have to before.

Jan

--
#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#================================================== JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com #

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Richard Troy 2006-10-27 19:57:34 Re: Replication documentation addition
Previous Message Tom Lane 2006-10-27 19:47:41 Re: qsort->pg_qsort in 8.2