From: | Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: qsort->pg_qsort in 8.2 |
Date: | 2006-10-27 19:56:51 |
Message-ID: | 45426483.6080304@Yahoo.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 10/27/2006 3:47 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com> writes:
>> since rev. 1.105 of include/port.h all files that inlcude postgres_fe.h
>> are forced to use pg_qsort() instead of qsort. Was that intended?
>
> Is it a problem? If you really want the platform qsort you can #undef
> qsort, but I don't entirely see why you would.
It forces client programs to link against libpgport, which they didn't
have to before.
Jan
--
#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#================================================== JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com #
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Richard Troy | 2006-10-27 19:57:34 | Re: Replication documentation addition |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-10-27 19:47:41 | Re: qsort->pg_qsort in 8.2 |