From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | mark(at)mark(dot)mielke(dot)cc |
Cc: | Richard Troy <rtroy(at)ScienceTools(dot)com>, Carlo Stonebanks <stonec(dot)register(at)sympatico(dot)ca>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: OT: TCL vs Perl Re: commit so slow program looks frozen |
Date: | 2006-10-26 18:32:02 |
Message-ID: | 4540FF22.409@commandprompt.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
> Perl has a wealth of modules on CPAN to do almost anything you need to.
> TCL has the beginning of one (not as rich), but comes built-in with things
> like event loops, and graphicals (Tk).
>
> I could go on and on - but I won't, because this is the PostgreSQL
> mailing list. People either get Perl, or TCL, or they don't. More
> people 'get' Perl, because it was marketted better, it's syntax is
> deceivingly comparable to other well known languages, and for the
> longest time, it was much faster than TCL to write (especially when
> using regular expressions) and faster to run.
>
> Did TCL get treated unfairly as a result? It's a language. Who cares! :-)
You forgot the god of scripting languages, Python... (Yes perl is much
better at system level scripting than Python).
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
>
> Cheers,
> mark
>
--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2006-10-26 19:08:38 | Re: Configuration Issue ? |
Previous Message | mark | 2006-10-26 18:07:06 | OT: TCL vs Perl Re: commit so slow program looks frozen |