Re: [HACKERS] Replication documentation addition

Hi,

Bruce Momjian wrote:
> I have updated the text. Please let me know what else I should change.
> I am unsure if I should be mentioning commercial PostgreSQL products in
> our documentation.

I support your POV and vote for not including any pointers to commercial
extensions in the official documentation. If at all, they should go to
'external-projects.sgml', where PostGIS, PgAdmin and other projects are
mentioned.

I can't really get excited about the exclusion of the term
'replication', because it's what most people are looking for. It's a
well known term. Sorry if it sounded that way, but I've not meant to
avoid that term.

The newly created terms 'Query Broadcast Load Balancing' or even worse
'Multi-Master Load Balancing' are more confusing than helpful, because
these terms do not exist. (See the googlefight in [1])

Can we name the chapter "Fail-over, Load-Balancing and Replication
Options"? That would fit everything and contain the necessary buzz words.

Also, I'm still missing Multi- vs Single-Master, which are also commonly
used terms.

IMHO, it does not make sense to speak of a synchronous replication for a
'Shared Disk Fail Over'. It's not replication, because there's no replica.

The Data Partitioning paragraph should probably mention it's close
relation with data partitioning across table spaces (and make the
differences clear).

What you call 'Query Broadcast Load Balancing' is also a multi-master
replication, thus naming only the later 'Multi-Master Load Balancing'
misleading.

I'd propose to add a subsection 'Synchronous, Multi-Master Replication'
and explain the different possibilities on how to do that:

* Query-Based
* with 2PC
* Distributed SHMEM
* (perhaps mention the optimized Postgres-R algorithm ;-)

What you called 'Single-Query Clustering' is probably better known as
'Parallel Query Execution'. It can be combined with all types of
replication (every combination of async / sync and Single- /
Multi-Master). It's maybe load balancing, but it depends on some form of
replication to distribute the data first.

I liked Chris Browns documentation in [2] which was clearer regarding
replication (which can be used to do fail-over, load-balancing,
data-partitioning or parallel query execution). I'd like to keep all
those things a little more separate to get them clear.

Regards

Markus

[1]: Googlefight: "Multi-Master Load Balancing" vs "Multi-Master
Replication": http://tinyurl.com/y3k76r

[2]: Chris Browns proposal for a replication documentation:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2006-08/msg00026.php