| From: | Markus Schaber <schabi(at)logix-tt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | PostgreSQL Performance List <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Index on two columns not used |
| Date: | 2006-10-23 15:17:06 |
| Message-ID: | 453CDCF2.6090208@logix-tt.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Hi, Alvaro,
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> Additionally, in most UPDATE cases, the new row version will fit into
>> the same page as the old version. In this case, the index does not have
>> to be changed, which is an additional speed improvement.
> Actually, when the UPDATE puts a new row version in the same heap page,
> the index must be updated anyway.
AFAICS only, when the index covers (directly or via function) a column
that's actually changed.
Changing columns the index does not depend on should not need any write
access to that index.
Correct me if I'm wrong.
Thanks,
Markus
--
Markus Schaber | Logical Tracking&Tracing International AG
Dipl. Inf. | Software Development GIS
Fight against software patents in Europe! www.ffii.org
www.nosoftwarepatents.org
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Worky Workerson | 2006-10-23 15:40:57 | Re: Best COPY Performance |
| Previous Message | Luke Lonergan | 2006-10-23 15:11:00 | Re: Best COPY Performance |