From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Carlo Stonebanks <stonec(dot)register(at)sympatico(dot)ca>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org, alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com |
Subject: | Re: Is ODBC that slow? |
Date: | 2006-10-21 03:40:12 |
Message-ID: | 4539969C.6070306@commandprompt.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
>> Try Command Prompt's ODBC driver. Lately it has been measured to be
>> consistently faster than psqlODBC.
>>
>> http://projects.commandprompt.com/public/odbcng
>
> just curious: what was the reasoning to reimplement the protocol stack
> in odbcng? the mainline odbc driver went in the other direction.
We wanted to be able to offer some options that we couldn't if based
around libpq.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
>
> carlo: please, please, get your mail server to quit telling me your
> mailbox is full :)
>
> merlin
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
>
--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-10-21 05:02:06 | Re: VACUUM Performance |
Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2006-10-21 03:39:17 | Re: Is ODBC that slow? |