Re: The HP MSA20 SATA-SCSI enclosure

From: Ron Johnson <ron(dot)l(dot)johnson(at)cox(dot)net>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: The HP MSA20 SATA-SCSI enclosure
Date: 2006-10-20 06:03:56
Message-ID: 453866CC.4040503@cox.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 07/06/06 23:02, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> On Thursday 06 July 2006 19:55, Ron Johnson wrote:
>> Being an HP/Compaq shop, I'm looking at an Opteron-and-SATA-based
>> DL145 G2 and an MSA20 SATA enclosure with a U320 interface to use
>> with RHES4 and PostgreSQL.
>
> I recently speced this exact hardware for a customer. When the customer called
> HP to order, HP told them that it is not appropriate for a database. They
> cited shorter life of the SATA drives and overall performance.
>
> Is it true? I don't know. I have used SATA enclosures for databases for
> sometime and have been quite happy with them.
>
> You may also to look at the ml30 which is SCSI.

Anyone else have experience with the MSA20 or the SmartArray 6404?

>> Anyone have Experience with this h/w+s/w combo? It will be used as
>> a "history server", so sub-second transaction times are not required.

- --
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA USA

Is "common sense" really valid?
For example, it is "common sense" to white-power racists that
whites are superior to blacks, and that those with brown skins
are mud people.
However, that "common sense" is obviously wrong.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFFOGbMS9HxQb37XmcRAn6CAKDjs+0sOT72lWcFgAJ9wnwdv1EqrACaA3zD
9b8CQL5ckn4BtrJJvUdc2iw=
=tswq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Chris 2006-10-20 06:27:51 Re: FastCgi / PostgreSQL: FATAL: Ident authentication failed
Previous Message Shane Ambler 2006-10-20 05:35:14 Re: Some newbie question