Re: Index on two columns not used

Tom Lane a écrit :
> Arnaud Lesauvage <thewild(at)freesurf(dot)fr> writes:
>> When I join these two tables, the 2-column index of the first table is
>> not used.
>> Why does the query planner think that this plan is better ?
>
> Hm, is gid by itself nearly unique in these tables? If so, the merge
> join would get only marginally more efficient by using both columns as
> merge conditions. Heikki's probably right to guess that the planner
> thinks it's better to use the smaller index.
>
> However, if there are lots of duplicate gids, then it ought to have
> preferred the two-column merge ...

gid is the primary key of the first table, so absolutely unique.
Thanks for the information Tom !

--
Arnaud