From: | Radcon Entec <radconentec(at)yahoo(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Plpgsql functions with output parameters |
Date: | 2009-06-04 12:10:59 |
Message-ID: | 453361.28796.qm@web43413.mail.sp1.yahoo.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
I have been beating my head against the documentation on plpgsql functions with output parameters for the last three hours, but I haven't been able to get them to work yet.
I am playing with the sum_n_product function, taken from the doucmentation:
-- Function: sum_n_product(integer, integer)
-- DROP FUNCTION sum_n_product(integer, integer);
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION sum_n_product(IN x integer, IN y integer, OUT sum integer, OUT prod integer)
RETURNS record AS
$BODY$
BEGIN
sum := x + y;
prod := x * y;
END;
$BODY$
LANGUAGE 'plpgsql' VOLATILE;
If I go to a query window and execute "select sum_n_product(2, 3)", I get back "(2,3)". I then wrote a function named "test_sum_n_product" to try to retrieve one of the numbers from inside the record (or whatever it is) that sum_n_product gave me.
Here is my first try:
CREATE or replace FUNCTION test_sum_n_product(x int4, y int4) returns int4 AS $$
declare
sum int4;
product int4;
result record;
BEGIN
select into sum, product sum_n_product($1, $2);
return sum;
END;
$$ LANGUAGE plpgsql;
When I call that function from a query window, I get:
ERROR: invalid input syntax for integer: "(5,6)"
CONTEXT: PL/pgSQL function "test_sum_n_product" line 6 at SQL statement
It seems that it's trying to stuff the entire record into the first variable I gave it. So, I tested that by changing the function to:
CREATE or replace FUNCTION test_sum_n_product(x int4, y int4) returns int4 AS $$
declare
sum int4;
product int4;
result record;
BEGIN
select into result sum_n_product($1, $2);
return 2;
END;
$$ LANGUAGE plpgsql;
This function ran successfully, and returned 2. While it confirms my hypothesis that I need to put what I get back from sum_n_product into a record, I'm no closer to getting individual numbers out of the record.
I thought maybe the record's fields would have the names of the output parameters, so I tried:
CREATE or replace FUNCTION test_sum_n_product(x int4, y int4) returns int4 AS $$
declare
sum int4;
product int4;
result record;
BEGIN
select into result sum_n_product($1, $2);
return result.sum;
END;
$$ LANGUAGE plpgsql;
I got:
ERROR: record "result" has no field "sum"
It seems to me, from working in C++ and C#, that to use an output parameter, I should define a place for the value to be written, and then I should pass the name of that place in to the function. That would make my function look like:
CREATE or replace FUNCTION test_sum_n_product(x int4, y int4) returns int4 AS $$
declare
sum int4;
product int4;
result record;
BEGIN
select into result sum_n_product($1, $2, sum, product);
return sum;
END;
$$ LANGUAGE plpgsql;
But when I try that, I get:
ERROR: function sum_n_product(integer, integer, integer, integer) does not exist
LINE 1: select sum_n_product( $1 , $2 , $3 , $4 )
^
HINT: No function matches the given name and argument types. You might need to add explicit type casts.
QUERY: select sum_n_product( $1 , $2 , $3 , $4 )
CONTEXT: PL/pgSQL function "test_sum_n_product" line 6 at SQL statement
So, I don't have any more guesses. How do I work with the record that comes back from a function with output parameters?
Thank you very much.
RobR
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz | 2009-06-04 12:18:03 | Re: Upgrading Database: need to dump and restore? |
Previous Message | Carlos Oliva | 2009-06-04 12:07:37 | Re: Upgrading Database: need to dump and restore? |