From: | "James B(dot) Byrne" <byrnejb(at)harte-lyne(dot)ca> |
---|---|
To: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: No return from trigger function |
Date: | 2009-04-08 20:19:18 |
Message-ID: | 45335.216.185.71.24.1239221958.squirrel@webmail.harte-lyne.ca |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Wed, April 8, 2009 16:06, Tom Lane wrote:
> "James B. Byrne" <byrnejb(at)harte-lyne(dot)ca> writes:
>> I just need another set of eyes to see whatever it is that I am
>> overlooking.
>
> The RETURN is inside the EXCEPTION clause.
>
> You really need two BEGINs here, one for the outer function body and
> one for the exception block around the INSERT.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
So, something like:
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION hll_pg_fn_ident_insert()
RETURNS TRIGGER AS $pg_fn$
-- ROW AFTER TRIGGER
-- trigger passes identifier_type and _description
-- received as ARGV[0] and ARGV[1]
BEGIN
BEGIN
INSERT INTO identifiers(...
...
EXCEPTION
WHEN ....
END;
RETURN NULL:
END;
--
*** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrne mailto:ByrneJB(at)Harte-Lyne(dot)ca
Harte & Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241
Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757
Canada L8E 3C3
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Chris Browne | 2009-04-08 20:31:33 | Re: Are there performance advantages in storing bulky field in separate table? |
Previous Message | hubert depesz lubaczewski | 2009-04-08 20:16:55 | Re: No return from trigger function |