From: | "Dan Langille" <dan(at)langille(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | "Harald Armin Massa" <haraldarminmassa(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: full disjunction in press kit for 8.2 |
Date: | 2006-10-15 22:15:34 |
Message-ID: | 45327AC6.29149.CAB0011@dan.langille.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
On 15 Oct 2006 at 23:20, Harald Armin Massa wrote:
> >
> > I wanted to
> > include a mention of the Full Disjunctions project because it bolsters our
> > claim to "the most advanced open source database", even though it won't be
> > ready for inclusion into the core code until at least v8.3.
> >
>
> That is a noble idea, Josh; and I think it really fits. I tried to follow
> that Full Disjunctions threads and discussions, but up to today I still do
> not know what a Full Disjunction really is.
>
> Is there anything more than the allready mentioned Web Link with that short
> abstract, that FD is good for Webservices (200points for
> BuzzWordCompatibilitie); but some simple example with 2 tables who are full
> disjunctioned would be very very helpfull.
>
> Has anyone a hint? (yes. I googled it)
http://code.google.com/soc/pgsql/appinfo.html?csaid=34B13296DE039A78
It looks to be useful for circular references.
--
Dan Langille : Software Developer looking for work
my resume: http://www.freebsddiary.org/dan_langille.php
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-10-16 04:03:15 | Re: PostgreSQL rebranding |
Previous Message | Shane Ambler | 2006-10-15 21:54:14 | Re: full disjunction in press kit for 8.2 |