| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
| Cc: | "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jim(at)nasby(dot)net>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org, Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, Kaare Rasmussen <kaare(at)jasonic(dot)dk> |
| Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL vs. SQL Server, Oracle |
| Date: | 2006-10-12 21:46:13 |
| Message-ID: | 452EB7A5.4080403@commandprompt.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
>> Not only that, but I think the very last answer really hit the nail
>> on the head when it comes to MySQL and PostgreSQL: there's no need
>> to take MySQL's trade-offs for even your light-weight applications.
>
> True.
>
>> The reality is, very few companies are willing to bet their a..erm,
>> donkey ;) on PostgreSQL... yet.
>
> I think this was true two years ago, but just about anybody here can
> name a whole bunch of outfits (and probably is not allowed to name
> others) that bet the farm on PostgreSQL. :)
Shhhhhhhhhhhhh! You will get me in trouble.
Joshua D. Drake
--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2006-10-13 01:27:17 | Re: USENIX LISA |
| Previous Message | David Fetter | 2006-10-12 20:25:16 | Re: PostgreSQL vs. SQL Server, Oracle |