From: | Ron Johnson <ron(dot)l(dot)johnson(at)cox(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: question on renaming a foreign key |
Date: | 2006-10-12 00:34:47 |
Message-ID: | 452D8DA7.80706@cox.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 10/11/06 19:15, Richard Broersma Jr wrote:
>>>> I doesn't appear that ALTER TABLE can change constraint
>>>> characteristics. You'd have to drop/recreate, no?
>>> Now that you mention it, I've never tried it or seen it done.
>>> Here I what I came up with:
>>>
>> [snip]
>>>
>>> It is nice to see things work so well. :-)
>> It would be interesting to see how well it works on a 50M row
>> table.
>
> Good point, but hopefully only small fraction of the 50 M rows
> would be affected and hopefully updating primary keys isn't a
> common occurrence.
I was thinking of the ALTER TABLE ... ADD CONSTRAINT column.
- --
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA USA
Is "common sense" really valid?
For example, it is "common sense" to white-power racists that
whites are superior to blacks, and that those with brown skins
are mud people.
However, that "common sense" is obviously wrong.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFFLY2nS9HxQb37XmcRAjYNAKDibxx/tTAXZxg8uCp3jJfaTGeb/ACgqQdT
yCvtOQMz0vGak51Gg1sC/OE=
=Q+Fz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Brent Wood | 2006-10-12 00:37:09 | Re: question on renaming a foreign key |
Previous Message | Ron Johnson | 2006-10-12 00:33:49 | Re: more anti-postgresql FUD |