Re: hstore isexists

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jim(at)nasby(dot)net>
Cc: Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: hstore isexists
Date: 2006-10-11 20:17:19
Message-ID: 452D514F.2030805@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 10:04:10AM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>> Teodor Sigaev wrote:
>>
>>> It's possible to create function 'exists' and mention only it in docs.
>>>
>> Good point. Will you do that, or do you want me to?
>>
>
> ISTM it would be better to mention the deprecated version and
> explicitly state that it's deprecated.
>
>

If we had had this in contrib previously with the deprecated call I
would agree. But it seems like bad practice and unnecessary clutter to
start off by deprecating something.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Theo Schlossnagle 2006-10-11 20:17:42 Re: Index Tuning Features
Previous Message Jim C. Nasby 2006-10-11 20:10:44 Re: hstore isexists