Re: optimal insert

From: Markus Schaber <schabi(at)logix-tt(dot)com>
To: Dirk Jagdmann <jagdmann(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: optimal insert
Date: 2006-10-11 12:31:57
Message-ID: 452CE43D.4030806@logix-tt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-sql

Hi, Dirk,

Dirk Jagdmann wrote:

> So for a batch of inserts the value of a stays the same, while for by
> arbitrary values are inserted. Now I have wondered if PostreSQL offers
> a smarter way to insert those values? A solution can contains usage of
> some plpgsql code.

[local]:postgres=# insert into a_b (a,b) SELECT 1,
(ARRAY[100,200,54,4577])[i] FROM generate_series(1,4) AS i;
INSERT 0 4

[local]:postgres=# select * from a_b;
a | b
---+------
1 | 100
1 | 200
1 | 54
1 | 4577

But I tend to agree with others that packing a whole bunch of INSERTs
into a single transaction, and using COPY instead will give you better
benefits.

HTH,
Markus
--
Markus Schaber | Logical Tracking&Tracing International AG
Dipl. Inf. | Software Development GIS

Fight against software patents in Europe! www.ffii.org
www.nosoftwarepatents.org

In response to

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Markus Schaber 2006-10-11 12:48:26 Re: deleting rows in specific order
Previous Message Mark R. Dingee 2006-10-11 11:02:47 Re: Temp tables and functions