From: | Ron Johnson <ron(dot)l(dot)johnson(at)cox(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Storing images in PostgreSQL databases (again) |
Date: | 2006-10-06 19:07:37 |
Message-ID: | 4526A979.105@cox.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 10/05/06 18:54, Jean-Christophe Roux wrote:
> Why would I set a bytea column (containing picures) as a primary
> key? Because I want to be sure that the same image is inserted
> only once (that requirement comes from a real project) and using
> a primary key for that purpose makes sense to me.
A hash function makes better sense. SHA-1 creates a 20 byte string
that is the digest of the file. Almost perfect as a primary key.
SHA-256 (so far!) guarantees uniqueness in 32 bytes.
> Am I going to
> retrieve an image row by its image data? I would certainly like!
> For instance, I would like to get the pictures whose main color
> is green (requirement from a real project), and a select * from
> images where main_color(image) = 'green' would be nice.
That would speedily be handled by preprocessing metadata records as
the image is inserted.
- --
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA USA
Is "common sense" really valid?
For example, it is "common sense" to white-power racists that
whites are superior to blacks, and that those with brown skins
are mud people.
However, that "common sense" is obviously wrong.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFFJql5S9HxQb37XmcRAgYjAKCeTur3N/AUwQLI79GYbde8nCMYwACfejg+
Xe3qGl7GHlhC4jssvGkAJ6w=
=dW03
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-10-06 19:16:19 | Re: URGENT - startup process (PID 29541) was terminated by signal 6 |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-10-06 19:05:48 | Re: DELETE eats up all memory and crashes box |