Re: 2nd update on TOAST

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL HACKERS <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 2nd update on TOAST
Date: 2000-07-05 21:18:49
Message-ID: 4525.962831929@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

JanWieck(at)t-online(dot)de (Jan Wieck) writes:
> size to initdb and the problems started. I can create a table
> with 500+ attributes. Also I can create a view on it (the
> rules size is 170K - whow). Anything works pretty well, just
> a pg_dump output is garbage.

Are you using current sources? Bruce committed Philip Warner's
pg_dump rewrite a day or so ago (which I thought was way premature,
but anyway...). Just want to know which pg_dump we're talking about.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ron Peterson 2000-07-05 21:32:30 Re: [HACKERS] Re: Revised Copyright: is this morepalatable?
Previous Message Stephan Szabo 2000-07-05 21:09:00 Re: Case sensitivity