| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
| Cc: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Grzegorz Jaskiewicz <gj(at)pointblue(dot)com(dot)pl>, Hitoshi Harada <umi(dot)tanuki(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Closing some 8.4 open items |
| Date: | 2009-04-11 19:12:39 |
| Message-ID: | 4524.1239477159@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> writes:
> Tom,
> It fits into 80 columns if you don't have any functions with 11
> parameters. ;-)
Well, yeah, but in typical cases I think it fits. A look at the current
regression database shows all but 6 of 117 functions fitting. With
another ten characters eaten by a new column, a lot more of them would
wrap.
> Actually, I'm thinking the new column ought to be called "type".
Yes, that's what I had in mind too.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Fetter | 2009-04-11 19:23:24 | Re: Closing some 8.4 open items |
| Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2009-04-11 19:09:57 | Re: Unicode string literals versus the world |