| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Grzegorz Jaskiewicz <gj(at)pointblue(dot)com(dot)pl>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Subject: | Re: WIP: default values for function parameters |
| Date: | 2008-12-12 13:47:17 |
| Message-ID: | 4524.1229089637@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
"David E. Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com> writes:
> I'm okay with AS if that's the way it has to be, but what about a
> colon right at the end of the label?
Hmm ... a colon isn't considered to be an operator name, so this
wouldn't break any existing usage. I'm a little bit worried about
what we might be cutting ourselves off from in the future, but
maybe it's a good solution.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2008-12-12 13:47:42 | Re: WIP: default values for function parameters |
| Previous Message | David E. Wheeler | 2008-12-12 13:43:02 | Re: WIP: default values for function parameters |