Re: simple case using index on windows but not on linux

simon godden wrote:
>> If the index isn't used, then we have problem #3. I think this is what
>> you are actually seeing. Your locale is something other than "C" and PG
>> doesn't know how to use like with indexes. Read up on operator classes
>> or change your locale.
>> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.1/static/indexes-opclass.html
>
> Aha - that sounds like it - this is the output from locale
>
> LANG=en_US.UTF-8
> LC_CTYPE="en_US.UTF-8"
..
> I guess it cannot determine the collating sequence?

It can, but isn't sure that it can rely on LIKE 'A%' being the same as
>= 'A' and < 'B' (not always true). Re-creating the index with the
right opclass will tell it this is the case.

> I'm not too familiar with unix locale issues - does this output match
> your problem description?

OK - quick intro to locales. Create a file /tmp/sortthis containing the
following:
---begin file---
BBB
CCC
AAA
A CAT
A DOG
ACAT
---end file---
Now run "sort /tmp/sortthis". You'll probably see spaces get ignored.
Now run "LANG=C sort /tmp/sortthis". You'll probably see a traditional
ASCII ("C") sort. If not try LC_COLLATE rather than LANG.

> Can you explain how to change my locale to 'C'? (I'm quite happy for
> you to tell me to RTFM, as I know this is not a linux user mailing
> list :)

You'll want to dump your databases and re-run initdb with a locale of
"C" (or no locale). See:
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.1/static/app-initdb.html

That will mean all sorting will be on ASCII value. The problem is that
the database picks up the operating-system's default locale when you
install it from package. Not always what you want, but then until you
understand the implications you can't really decide one way or the other.

HTH

--
Richard Huxton
Archonet Ltd