From: | Markus Schaber <schabi(at)logix-tt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Performace Optimization for Dummies |
Date: | 2006-10-03 08:15:27 |
Message-ID: | 45221C1F.3010908@logix-tt.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Hi, Carlo,
Carlo Stonebanks wrote:
>> Did you think about putting the whole data into PostgreSQL using COPY in
>> a nearly unprocessed manner, index it properly, and then use SQL and
>> stored functions to transform the data inside the database to the
>> desired result?
>
> This is actually what we are doing. The slowness is on the row-by-row
> transformation. Every row reqauires that all the inserts and updates of the
> pvious row be committed - that's why we have problems figuring out how to
> use this using SQL set logic.
Maybe "group by", "order by", "distinct on" and hand-written functions
and aggregates (like first() or best()) may help.
You could combine all relevant columns into an user-defined compund
type, then group by entity, and have a self-defined aggregate generate
the accumulated tuple for each entity.
Markus
--
Markus Schaber | Logical Tracking&Tracing International AG
Dipl. Inf. | Software Development GIS
Fight against software patents in Europe! www.ffii.org
www.nosoftwarepatents.org
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Markus Schaber | 2006-10-03 08:20:45 | Re: Performace Optimization for Dummies |
Previous Message | Jérôme BENOIS | 2006-10-03 07:36:22 | Re: High CPU Load |