From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
Cc: | pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: PGDG ODBC, ODBCng, DBD::Pg |
Date: | 2006-09-29 15:21:17 |
Message-ID: | 451D39ED.4060700@commandprompt.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-odbc |
>>
>> The versions tested were:
>>
>> PGDG: 08.01.0200-2
>> ODBCng: Rev 76
>> DBD::Pg: 1.49
>
> Any chance of running the same test again against psqlODBC 08.02.0100?
> It's a totally different architecture to the 08.01 series.
Be happy to.
>
> You might also try something like odbc-bench for some more realistic
> tests.
You bet.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
>
> Cheers, Dave.
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
>
--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2006-09-29 15:49:43 | Re: PGDG ODBC, ODBCng, DBD::Pg |
Previous Message | Andrus | 2006-09-29 11:05:29 | Re: New release of psqODBC? |