| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Dunstan <pgsql(at)tomd(dot)cc>, Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: 8.3 Development Cycle |
| Date: | 2006-09-22 17:36:42 |
| Message-ID: | 45141F2A.8080009@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Josh Berkus wrote:
> Tom,
>
>> I'm obviously thinking of enums which was ready (for review at least) a
>> few weeks ago, but has probably bitrotted slightly since then given the
>> number of patches that have landed in the tree. I intended to brush it
>> up as soon as the 8.3 tree was open and resubmit it. Will that be a
>> waste of time?
>
> Ooops. Are you sure these weren't committed?
>
>
It's not committed - it was submitted long after feature freeze (in
fact, coding didn't begin until after freeze). But it's fairly liable to
bitrot, since it touches the catalog in a significant way.
cheers
andrew
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-09-22 17:38:21 | Re: advisory locks and permissions |
| Previous Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2006-09-22 17:29:06 | Re: advisory locks and permissions |