Re: 8.3 Development Cycle

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: 8.3 Development Cycle
Date: 2006-09-22 14:42:21
Message-ID: 4513F64D.9010408@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Dave Page wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:bruce(at)momjian(dot)us]
>>> Sent: 22 September 2006 15:26
>>> To: Dave Page
>>> Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
>>> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] 8.3 Development Cycle
>>>
>>> Sounds fine, but announcing this now is almost certain to reduce the
>>> number of people migrating to 8.2. I am not saying we shouldn't
>>> announce it now, but it is something I wanted to mention.
>>>
>> Err right - if you had said this yesterday when we discussed the idea I
>> could have mentioned it in my message. Right around the time you said
>> "Go for it" would have been good :-)
>>
>
> I didn't think of it until today. Sorry. Personally, I don't like
> manipulating people by withholding information, so I still think we are
> doing the right thing. I am just saying it might have that effect.
>
>

They will upgrade if they want the new features, as usual. I had dinner
with 3 significant users yesterday and mentioned to them the new
facility to add or drop inheritance on tables, and their reaction was
along the lines of "When can I have it? I want it now!" They won't be
deterred by the fact that the next dev cycle will be a bit shorter.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Page 2006-09-22 14:42:58 Re: 8.3 Development Cycle
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2006-09-22 14:34:53 Re: 8.3 Development Cycle