| From: | Bo Lorentsen <bl(at)netgroup(dot)dk> |
|---|---|
| To: | Csaba Nagy <nagy(at)ecircle-ag(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Bill Moran <wmoran(at)collaborativefusion(dot)com>, Postgres general mailing list <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Replication and PITR |
| Date: | 2006-09-22 05:53:48 |
| Message-ID: | 45137A6C.4000705@netgroup.dk |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Csaba Nagy wrote:
> That's gone with 8.2, it will be possible to stream the last
> modifications, or force a WAL recycle periodically, whatever fits you
> better. There is some new infrastructure which allows these things,
> although I didn't have the time to play with them.
>
This sound very nice, where can I find more info about this ... and when
is 8.2 expected to be released ? And are there anyone else that plays
with making build in replication for PG 8.2 ?
> The big improvement would be indeed to have the infrastructure to start
> up a standby by simply pointing it to the master server, no other setup
> needed. Implement that, make it reliable, and any beginner to postgres
> will be able to easily set up a WAL shipping based standby. Right now
> you still have to do some complicated scripting to make it work (no idea
> how much 8.2 will help here, didn't try yet).
>
Do you know what the motivation for these changes have been ? Better
PITR or is replication a direct goal ?
/BL
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bo Lorentsen | 2006-09-22 05:58:41 | Re: Replication and PITR |
| Previous Message | Casey Duncan | 2006-09-22 05:48:00 | Re: Backup Large Tables |