| From: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, mkoi-pg(at)aon(dot)at |
| Subject: | Re: Getting rid of cmin and cmax |
| Date: | 2006-09-19 18:23:28 |
| Message-ID: | 451035A0.5030303@enterprisedb.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane kirjoitti:
> I'm also concerned about loss of debug traceability if these fields
> disappear entirely from disk --- it's been handy more than once to be
> able to tell where in a complex transaction something happened.
>
Sure. We'll just have to try to compensate that with debug messages
etc., whatever scheme we choose.
> Lastly, at least on machines with 8-byte MAXALIGN, removing four more
> bytes from heap headers would save nothing. So I'm not excited about
> going through enormous pushups to get rid of both fields, when a far
> simpler and better-performing mechanism suffices to remove one.
>
It would be a win on 32-bit architectures. And there has been discussion of
storing at least some data types unaligned.
--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Stefan Kaltenbrunner | 2006-09-19 18:25:19 | Re: -HEAD planner issue wrt hash_joins on dbt3 ? |
| Previous Message | Marc Evans | 2006-09-19 18:12:53 | Re: Odd behavior observed |