| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Paul Ramsey <pramsey(at)refractions(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Ale Raza <araza(at)esri(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, John Baleja <jbaleja(at)esri(dot)com>, PostGIS Development Discussion <postgis-devel(at)postgis(dot)refractions(dot)net> |
| Subject: | Re: Where to find kind code for STATISTIC_KIND GEOMETRY? |
| Date: | 2007-05-04 17:17:31 |
| Message-ID: | 4510.1178299051@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Paul Ramsey <pramsey(at)refractions(dot)net> writes:
> Just take 150-199, and submit a patch to HACKERS to updates the comment
> in pg_statistic appropriately. I am sure the it will be some time before
> we invent another 49 kinds of selectivity statistic.
I've been on the wrong wavelength in this whole thread --- I thought the
OP wanted to know about some existing "kind" value used by PostGIS. If
he's asking to be allocated some new "kind" values for code he intends
to write, I have no problem with giving him 200-299 ... it's not like
we seem to be in any danger of running out. But please do submit a
patch in the style of the existing pg_statistic.h comments, showing who
controls those numbers and where they will be documented.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2007-05-04 17:33:30 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Teach tuplesort.c about "top N" sorting, in which only the first |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-05-04 17:08:18 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Teach tuplesort.c about "top N" sorting, in which only the first |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Gregory Stark | 2007-05-04 17:34:11 | Re: updated SORT/LIMIT patch |
| Previous Message | Paul Ramsey | 2007-05-04 17:06:44 | Re: Where to find kind code for STATISTIC_KIND GEOMETRY? |