Re: Mid cycle release?

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jimn(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Dunstan <tom(at)tomd(dot)cc>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Mid cycle release?
Date: 2006-09-17 00:28:24
Message-ID: 450C96A8.9040901@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 14, 2006 at 02:36:22PM -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>> But on a serious note, the problem I run into is exactly the opposite.
>> Someone will turn on autovacuum because they thought it was a good idea
>> and for their work load, it isn't. So instead of creating new and
>> interesting ways to allow their database to be more efficient, I am
>> dealing with snafu's created by my own community.
>
> Then we should change autovacuum so that it stays out of the way when
> tables are being vacuumed frequently enough via an external means.

ALTER TABLE foo DISABLE autovacuum? :)

Joshua D. Drake

--

=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen Frost 2006-09-17 00:29:49 Re: New version of money type
Previous Message Jim C. Nasby 2006-09-17 00:15:23 Re: Mid cycle release?