Re: Release notes

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Release notes
Date: 2006-09-15 05:11:11
Message-ID: 450A35EF.3010405@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


>> Then there is the problem that we need consistent wording through the
>> release notes, so again, I have to wack around some more text.
>
> I think this is a strange objection. Many different people have
> contributed to the documentation, and yet we've managed to keep the
> wording reasonably consistent throughout -- I think we can manage
> consistent usage in some release notes. Frankly, the grammar and diction
> in the release notes is often not perfect on the first draft anyway, so
> there needs to be copy-editing done regardless.
>
>> Doing it in one pass is the most reliable, and efficient.
>
> Does anyone else have any opinions on this?

Does +1 count?

Joshua D. Drake

>
> -Neil
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
>

--

=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Dunstan 2006-09-15 05:26:27 Re: Mid cycle release?
Previous Message Tom Dunstan 2006-09-15 04:41:30 Re: Mid cycle release?