From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> |
Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Release notes |
Date: | 2006-09-15 05:11:11 |
Message-ID: | 450A35EF.3010405@commandprompt.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
>> Then there is the problem that we need consistent wording through the
>> release notes, so again, I have to wack around some more text.
>
> I think this is a strange objection. Many different people have
> contributed to the documentation, and yet we've managed to keep the
> wording reasonably consistent throughout -- I think we can manage
> consistent usage in some release notes. Frankly, the grammar and diction
> in the release notes is often not perfect on the first draft anyway, so
> there needs to be copy-editing done regardless.
>
>> Doing it in one pass is the most reliable, and efficient.
>
> Does anyone else have any opinions on this?
Does +1 count?
Joshua D. Drake
>
> -Neil
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
>
--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Dunstan | 2006-09-15 05:26:27 | Re: Mid cycle release? |
Previous Message | Tom Dunstan | 2006-09-15 04:41:30 | Re: Mid cycle release? |