From: | Markus Schaber <schabi(at)logix-tt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL SQL List <pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Aggregates with internal state type? |
Date: | 2006-09-13 21:19:56 |
Message-ID: | 450875FC.9040907@logix-tt.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-sql |
Hi, Tom,
Tom Lane wrote:
> Markus Schaber <schabi(at)logix-tt(dot)com> writes:
>> This lead me to the question whether it is possible to use "internal" as
>> state type for an Aggregate whose functions are implemented in C.
>
> No, because the system has no idea what the representation of an
> "internal" state value might be, and in particular how to copy it.
> The same goes for other pseudotypes.
Ah, I see. So there's no possibility to pass some void* kind of
intermediate data, I have to craft at least a dummy PostgreSQL datatype
for it.
This also solves the question how such things would be cleaned up in
case of an intermediate error.
Thanks,
Markus
--
Markus Schaber | Logical Tracking&Tracing International AG
Dipl. Inf. | Software Development GIS
Fight against software patents in EU! www.ffii.org www.nosoftwarepatents.org
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-09-13 21:25:17 | Re: Aggregates with internal state type? |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-09-13 21:13:07 | Re: Aggregates with internal state type? |