Re: psql patch

Tom Lane a ecrit le 13/09/2006 18:05:
> Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> writes:
>> diff -r1.89 print.c
>> 853c853
>> < snprintf(record_str, 64, "* Record %lu", record++);
>> ---
>>> snprintf(record_str, 64, _("* Record %lu"), record++);
>> 855c855
>> < snprintf(record_str, 64, "[ RECORD %lu ]", record++);
>> ---
>>> snprintf(record_str, 64, _("[ RECORD %lu ]"), record++);
>
> Hm, these strings were never localizable in previous versions; if we
> make them so, do we risk breaking any code that examines psql output?
>

Don't know but I always thought tools shoudn't rely on strings output.

> What about the equivalent headers in the other output formats?
>

Which one ? can you give me an example ?

Regards.

--
Guillaume.