Re: dump / restore functionality

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Naz Gassiep <naz(at)mira(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: dump / restore functionality
Date: 2006-09-12 15:18:08
Message-ID: 4506CFB0.5040108@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


> That seems like a rather spectacular overstatement of the likely
> benefits, not to mention a misdescription of what was discussed.
>
> AFAIR what was discussed was separating

Yes, that is what was discussed.

> - schema stuff needed before loading data
> - table data
> - schema stuff needed after loading data
> where the last category boils down to "indexes and then foreign keys".
> All the "other stuff" such as functions really needs to be in the
> first part ... or at least there's no visible benefit to delaying
> loading it.

Right. This breakdown I still think would be useful. An additional item
that would be useful is to allow pg_restore to restore plain text dumps.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake

>
> regards, tom lane
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
> choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
> match
>

--

=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Strong, David 2006-09-12 15:46:19 Re: Lock partitions
Previous Message Tom Lane 2006-09-12 14:59:34 Re: currentItemData & currentMarkData