Re: On DNS for postgresql.org

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Steve Atkins <steve(at)blighty(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: On DNS for postgresql.org
Date: 2006-09-07 01:18:36
Message-ID: 44FF736C.1070007@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

>>
>> When you commit to providing services to this community, it is
>> absolutely the business of that community on how the infrastructure is
>> managed.
>
> It is the business of the community that the services provided are
> adequate and stable, certainly. That's become rather obvious recently.
>
> Irrelevant details of the server configuration that do not directly
> affect those services aren't really something to gossip about on a
> public mailing list, though.

I can agree with that.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake

>
> The two are quite different things.
>
>> The people offering these services have a responsibility to insure
>> that their infrastructure is well managed. If people are not up to
>> that responsibility, there are plenty of providers willing to take it on.
>
> Cheers,
> Steve
>
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
>

--

=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Steve Atkins 2006-09-07 01:23:06 Re: On DNS for postgresql.org
Previous Message Tim Allen 2006-09-07 00:58:19 Re: On DNS for postgresql.org