Re: On DNS for postgresql.org

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: On DNS for postgresql.org
Date: 2006-09-07 00:29:12
Message-ID: 44FF67D8.2060905@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

>
>> Also the servers are volunteer provided, so
>> it's not really anyones business other than the server owners.
>
> Given that the entire postgresql.org infrastructure just went off the
> air because of what sure looked to me like an error in
> administration, I submit that it _is_ others' business how the
> infrastructure is managed

When you commit to providing services to this community, it is
absolutely the business of that community on how the infrastructure is
managed.

The people offering these services have a responsibility to insure that
their infrastructure is well managed. If people are not up to that
responsibility, there are plenty of providers willing to take it on.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake

>
> A
>

--

=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Steve Atkins 2006-09-07 00:34:07 Re: On DNS for postgresql.org
Previous Message Arturo Perez 2006-09-06 22:57:13 Re: Problems with sequences