Re: @ versus ~, redux

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su>, Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>
Subject: Re: @ versus ~, redux
Date: 2006-09-04 01:11:52
Message-ID: 44FB7D58.9010303@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
>
>> How about?:
>> 4. do 1+3, i.e. flip the GIN operators to keep core consistency, but
>> deprecate the operators for both contrib and core. Something more
>> visually like set ops would be ideal.
>>
>
> If we're going to adopt new preferred names, I see no reason to support
> the old confusing names for operators that have never existed before
> 8.2. There is no backward-compatibility argument to be made there.
>
>
>

You're right. I misread your original proposal. I vote for #3.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2006-09-04 01:33:58 Re: [HACKERS] Interval month, week -> day
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2006-09-04 01:03:39 Re: Getting a move on for 8.2 beta