Re: Coding style for emacs

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jim(at)nasby(dot)net>
Cc: Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Gregory Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Coding style for emacs
Date: 2006-09-03 01:28:16
Message-ID: 44FA2FB0.5030106@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 02, 2006 at 07:22:45PM +0100, Gregory Stark wrote:
>
>> "Jim C. Nasby" <jim(at)nasby(dot)net> writes:
>>
>>
>>> Has anyone considered adding vi/vim options to the files themselves?
>>> Granted, not a trivial task, but it would ensure anyone using vim would
>>> have the correct settings. I don't know if emacs has the same ability
>>> (I've seen the "Hey emacs, this is a C file" stuff...)
>>>
>> Certainly it does; it even knows that certain variables are safe to allow
>> files to set without warning the user and it has the indention marked as such.
>>
>> I think this would be what you would want.
>>
>> /*
>> * Local variables:
>> * eval: (c-set-style "bsd")
>> * tab-width: 4
>> * c-basic-offset: 4
>> * End:
>> */
>>
>> But it would have to be on the end of every single file which would be pretty
>> heavyweight.
>>
>
> Yeah, which is the real question... do people think it's worth it enough
> to move towards doing that? Of course the nice thing is that *anyone*
> (even me :) ) could produce a patch to do that.
>

No, please don't. Greg is right, it is way too heavyweight. It's not a
one off exercise. You'd have to check every new file.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andreas Pflug 2006-09-03 01:28:31 Re: Autovacuum on by default?
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2006-09-03 01:27:07 Re: better support of out parameters in plperl

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2006-09-03 01:30:25 Re: better support of out parameters in plperl
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2006-09-03 01:27:07 Re: better support of out parameters in plperl