From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: TODO Request |
Date: | 2006-08-30 05:16:30 |
Message-ID: | 44F51F2E.6060000@commandprompt.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> "Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
>> Can we get:
>
>> Multiple table indexes (for uniqueness across partitions for example)
>> Auto creations of partitions
>> Hash partitioning
>> Key partitioning
>> Sub partitioning
>
>> Added to the TODO list?
>
> Perhaps a certain amount of specificity as to what these mean,
> and why we need them, would be appropriate.
Further on this is an additional reference:
http://www.psoug.org/reference/partitions.html
We should also probably add:
Allow planner to correctly use indexes on min/max across partitions
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
>
> regards, tom lane
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org so that your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
>
--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Glaesemann | 2006-08-30 05:44:42 | Re: [HACKERS] Interval aggregate regression failure (expected seems |
Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2006-08-30 05:12:59 | Re: TODO Request |