From: | Hiroshi Inoue <inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp> |
---|---|
To: | Stijn Vanroye <s(dot)vanroye(at)easytowork(dot)nl> |
Cc: | "'pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org'" <pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Latest ODBC driver? / lo (blob) problem with fieldtype |
Date: | 2006-08-30 03:19:22 |
Message-ID: | 44F503BA.50608@tpf.co.jp |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-odbc |
Stijn Vanroye wrote:
> Thanks for the reply's dave. I'll give them a try.
>
> About the blob/lo problem. I'm not sure if this problem is strictly a Delphi issue.
> It seems that in the backend for version 8.0 (maybe a bit before that, I'm not sure),
> the implementation for the lo-datatype changed. Now it's a domain, before you had to
> create your own type named lo to have a field capable of storing (Binary) Large OBjects.
> Somehow the field is now recognized in Delphi as an IntegerField, and no longer as a field for
large objects.
>
> Just a thought of mine, but maybe the implementation in the backend changed, so the ODBC
> recognizes and passes the field as type integer, and no longer as a lo/blob field.
> Otherwise it's something in the implementation of the ODBC driver itself that passes the
> field type as something that delphi understands as integer, maybe the odbc really says it's an
integerfield.
>
> I'll try the 08.02 and see what that does.
Please check 7.4+ Protocol option when you try lo domain type.
regards,
Hiroshi Inoue
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Hiroshi Inoue | 2006-08-30 03:59:21 | Re: Latest ODBC driver? |
Previous Message | Jonah H. Harris | 2006-08-30 02:11:22 | Re: Oracle HSODBC problems |