| From: | Hans-Juergen Schoenig <postgres(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
|---|---|
| To: | Zoltan Boszormenyi <zboszor(at)dunaweb(dot)hu> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Performance testing of COPY (SELECT) TO |
| Date: | 2006-08-28 17:01:45 |
| Message-ID: | 44F32179.9000506@cybertec.at |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
>> On the other hand I don't see why you are arguing in favor of a useless
>> feature whose coding is dubious; you can have _the same thing_ with nice
>> code and no discussion.
>>
>
> Because of [1] and because Mr. Schoenig's arguments
> about changing schemas.
>
first of all; hans is enough - skip the mr ;)
i think changing schema is a good argument but we could sacrifice that
for the sake of clarity and clean code. i am not against keeping it but
i can understand the argument against views. i always preferred select.
mr hans ;)
--
Cybertec Geschwinde & Schönig GmbH
Schöngrabern 134; A-2020 Hollabrunn
Tel: +43/1/205 10 35 / 340
www.postgresql.at, www.cybertec.at
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-08-28 17:11:33 | Re: updated patch for selecting large results sets in psql using cursors |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2006-08-28 17:00:13 | Re: [HACKERS] Performance testing of COPY (SELECT) TO |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-08-28 17:11:33 | Re: updated patch for selecting large results sets in psql using cursors |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2006-08-28 17:00:13 | Re: [HACKERS] Performance testing of COPY (SELECT) TO |