From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-documentation <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] New XML section for documentation |
Date: | 2006-08-26 20:31:08 |
Message-ID: | 44F0AF8C.8010404@commandprompt.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers |
>>> bear some similarity to PL/Java and PL/J.
>> I think the big question is whether we are ever going to implement
>> these? I think we need to decide that before I mention them.
>
> The SQL/Schemata thing is already in. I think we should at least
> mention which features that we already have are from what part of the
> standard.
I also see PSM and OLB as a target.
Joshua D. Drake
> As far as the rest of the standard goes, we might want to
> mention whether we've even considered any of each piece in the TODO
> list, and what sub-pieces, if any, are already included/scheduled/too
> silly to contemplate :)
>
> Cheers,
> D
--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2006-08-27 09:24:07 | Re: [HACKERS] New XML section for documentation |
Previous Message | Joe Conway | 2006-08-26 20:08:03 | Re: VALUES clause memory optimization |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2006-08-26 20:32:17 | Re: [Pgsqlrpms-hackers] Safer auto-initdb for RPM init |
Previous Message | Joe Conway | 2006-08-26 20:08:03 | Re: VALUES clause memory optimization |