Re: Some minor changes to pgbench

Tom Lane wrote:
> "Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
>> Tom Lane wrote:
>>> Addition of foreign key checking will certainly impact performance
>>> significantly.
>
>> That is kind of the point. Without foreign keys it is a flawed test
>> because you wouldn't be running in production without them and thus you
>> can't bench without them.
>
> pgbench is not about reality, though. If we can't rely on it to give
> consistent results across versions then I don't think it's useful at all.
> There are many other benchmarks you can run that do speak to reality
> (eg OSDL's work).

Would it be worthwhile to add a switch so that the foreign key test is
only used "if" they use the switch in conjunction with a -i?

Joshua D. Drake

>
> regards, tom lane
>

--

=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/