From: | mdean <mdean(at)xn1(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Replication |
Date: | 2006-08-21 04:06:13 |
Message-ID: | 44E93135.10508@xn1.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
One person who commented on the The business of Postbrsql made this comment:
Posted Aug 3, 2006 8:45 UTC (Thu) by subscriber *jgarzik* [Link
<http://lwn.net/Articles/193946/>]Cluster immaturity. MySQL has been
shipping a workable single-master replication+failover for quite a while
now in most Linux distros. MySQL's multi-master solution, while
requiring RAM (not disk) for storage, is also well-integrated and
deployed in production.
In contrast, the PostgreSQL team has chosen to provide hooks for
replication and failover. This has led to a situation where there are
multiple projects supporting replications/failover, none of which are
production-ready nor shipped in a modern Linux distro.
Modern systems *must* scale beyond a single computer, and the PostgreSQL
support shipped in modern Linux distros is completely incapable of this.
I really would appreciate a response. Thanks~ Michael
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.405 / Virus Database: 268.11.3/423 - Release Date: 8/18/2006
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2006-08-21 04:09:06 | Re: Replication |
Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2006-08-21 03:52:26 | Re: PostgreSQL on 64 bit Linux |